|
|
Today, the 4- and 6-bladed versions of the impeller are most common. His power numbers seem high, compared to what we are used to seeing with RTs today. It is possible that his equipment was reading a bit high, but the values on the Impellers Page and in the first two yellow columns of this table are directly quoted from his tables. Here we offer a relative scale of power numbers (Np(rel)), relative to the most common Rushton Turbine, the RT-6. Remember that placement of the RT in the tank does affect the Np, so before you think everyone is wrong, check the conditions under which their power study was done. If you are convinced that your NP(RT6) is correct, you can use this handy table to estimate what a different type of Rushton Turbine might do at the same location. For this table, the impeller off bottom distance, OB, is equal to the impeller diameter, OB/D=1.0. The liquid level is equal to the tank diameter, Z/T=1.0. The impeller diameter, D, is about 1/3 of the tank diameter, D/T=1/3. The fully baffled condition is assumed. Rushton studied the impact of the different baffle standard widths, 1/10th for the metric system and 1/12th for the American/British method. See the Baffle Section for more information on this. If you are using a 5-bladed RT in a gassed application, contact us to learn why you are probably having problems. If you are too shy to do that, you can wait and it will eventually be posted here at Post Mixing, but you may be wasting precious resources in the meantime. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Send mail to webmaster@postmixing.com with questions or comments about this web site. |